Profile photo of Stephen E. Neel, Esq.

Stephen E. Neel, Esq.

Arbitrator Mediator Special Master
Boston, MA, United States

About

Stephen E. Neel, Esq. possesses over 35 years of legal experience, having transitioned to a full-time dispute resolution practice following a distinguished career as a trial lawyer. His background includes representing both plaintiffs and defendants in complex civil litigation across various sectors, including commercial disputes, construction, and professional liability. He has presided over numerous mediations and arbitrations, drawing on his extensive courtroom experience to facilitate resolutions in high-stakes matters.

Practice Areas

Business & Commercial Civil Litigation Construction Employment & Labor Insurance Personal Injury & Torts Real Estate & Property

Professional Experience

Neutral
JAMS
Partner
McCormick
Neel & Sweeny
LLP
Trial Attorney
Private Practice

Publications Leadership

  • Frequent lecturer on ADR and trial practice for the Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education (MCLE)
  • Contributor to various legal publications regarding mediation strategies and arbitration procedures
  • Panelist for Boston Bar Association seminars on civil litigation

Positioning Takeaways

This neutral offers a comprehensive background in civil litigation that informs his practical approach to dispute resolution. His history of representing both defense and plaintiff interests provides a neutral foundation suitable for complex multi-party cases.

License & Certifications

  • Massachusetts Bar Admission
  • United States District Court
  • District of Massachusetts
  • United States Court of Appeals
  • First Circuit

Education

J.D.
Northeastern University School of Law
B.A.
Boston College

Distinction

Recognized for his ability to handle emotionally charged and legally complex disputes with a balanced perspective derived from representing both sides of the bar.

Reputation

He is regarded by legal professionals as a persistent and prepared neutral who maintains a calm demeanor while navigating difficult negotiations. Peers frequently cite his deep understanding of trial dynamics and his pragmatic approach to settlement.